Username:
Password:
Forgot Password?

18 May 06 Geoffrey Campbell Barnum CA of New South Wales

Print this Article Print this Article
Email this Article

Geoffrey Campbell Barnum CA of New South Wales 
 
18 May 2006
 
 
On his own admission the Professional Conduct Tribunal found a case established that Mr Barnum was liable to disciplinary action in accordance with By-law 40(e), in that on 7 October 2004 a delegate of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, being satisfied that he was not a fit and proper person to be or to act as:

  • a director or senior manager of a general insurer (other than a foreign general insurer), or 
  • a senior manager, or agent in Australia for the purpose of section 118 of the Insurance Act 1973 (the Act), or a foreign general insurer, or 
  • a director or senior manager of an authorised NOHC,
disqualified him from being or acting as the holder of a senior insurance role pursuant to subsection 25A(1) of the Act. 
 
The decision of the Tribunal was that Mr Barnum be ineligible for a certificate of public practice for a period, be fined $5000 and be severely reprimanded. The Tribunal also ordered that Mr Barnum pay $450 plus GST towards the costs of the disciplinary action. The reason for the Tribunal’s decision was that it found that Mr Barnum had displayed a level of integrity below that which is expected of a member of the Institute, however it recognised that he had received significant punishment at the hands of APRA.