Issue No 49/2006 - ANT49
21 December 2006
HEADLINES
- Seasons Greetings from Technical Standards
- IASB's Liabilities RoundTable - Melbourne
- AASB update on Differential Reporting
- The Institute's CABs' AIFRS Discussion Group meeting - 12 February 2007
- AASB releases revised standards
- IASB fair value measurement project
- AASB releases Updated List of Advisory Panel Members
- IFRIC 11 clarification
- IASB meeting highlights - 12-14 December 2006
- IFAC releases paper on Micro-Entity Financial Reporting
- IFAC releases two new International Public Sector standards
- Audit standards and Audit manuals
- Member services: your free 2007 Members' Handbook at the touch of a
button
- Query of the week - financial instrument disclosures
- EDs: comment closing dates
Welcome to the forty-seventh edition of Accounting & Auditing News Today for 2006. What
follows is a brief update on changes and proposed changes in the financial reporting sphere.
1.
Seasons Greetings from Technical Standards
This is the final ANT for 2006.
The Institute and its Technical Standards Team would like to thank you for your ongoing
support and subscription to ANT throughout the year. We hope you have a happy holiday season
and look forward to continue keeping you up to date with changes in the field of financial
reporting during 2007. The first issue of ANT in the new year will be released on Friday
12 January 2007.
The Institute's Financial Reporting helpline (both phone and email services) will close at
noon on Thursday 21 December 2006 and reopen 9am 3 Wednesday January 2007.
Emails and voicemails received during this period will be answered as promptly as possible
once the service reopens on Wednesday 3 January 2007. For technical assistance during this
period try the technical resources page of our website http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au.
Top
2.
IASB's Liabilities RoundTable - Melbourne
The IASB held a RoundTable at the Institute's Melbourne Office on 20 December to consider a
number of Issues arising from its June 2005 ED 'Proposed Amendments to IAS 37 Provisions,
Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets' (AASB ED 140). The IASB had held earlier
RoundTables in Norwalk (US) and 3 in London, so it is a measure of the respect that the IASB
has for Australian Constituents that had made a submission on ED 140 (which included the
Institute), that a RoundTable has been held, so far from the IASB/FASB Offices, and so close
to the Christmas/New Year break!
If the IASB was hoping to get Australian support for its many tentative decisions on ED 140,
it would be somewhat disappointed, as most of the Australian Constituents are troubled by
the IASB's determination to measure a Liability as the 'best estimate of the expenditure
required to settle the obligation (Liability) at balance date'. Most Australian
Constituents, including the Institute in its October 2005 submission, believe that the
measurement base should continue to be the best estimate that the Liability will be
'expected to be ultimately settled for', discounted for the time value of money where
material.
This discussion is not as theoretical as some might think. If the IASB's Tentative View
prevails, it will mean that there will be a need to inflate the liability for both 'risk'
and 'commercial fee' factors as the best estimate at balance date is what an independent 3rd
party or the entity that is due the obligation (liability), is prepared to accept to settle
at balance date - a fair value type concept.
There is also a concern that the IASB's ED 140 proposals would not lead to closer
convergence with the US, which is the IASB's global vision for one set of truly Global
Standards. However this may change as the current US standard was issued some 30 years ago
and indications are that the US will use the Conceptual Framework Program as a way of
updating its liabilities standard.
There was general agreement that whilst an amended standard should remain principles based,
there is a need to provide more guidance via examples to clarify the principles in the
standard, and additional disclosure on contingent liabilities (stand ready obligations) is
important to users regardless of the accounting treatment.
Other Issues that the IASB was seeking input on were: - Further guidance on determining
whether a present obligation (liability) exists where its existence is uncertain - agreed;
- Guidance on whether the commencement of litigation or a breach which if made known would
trigger litigation gives rise to a provision - a mixed response with the Institute arguing
that it is an indicator but not conclusive;
- The need for certainty and probability (for measurement only) in determining whether a
present obligation exists - again mixed views depending on the particular circumstances of
the liability;
- Replacing the term 'Contingent Liability' with 'Stand Ready Obligations' - not generally
supported
It was also noted that the consideration of ED 140 really is also part of the
overall Conceptual Framework debate, which the IASB and the FASB are currently working on,
so don't expect any quick decisions by the IASB or the AASB at this time. It is intended
that a Summary of all of the RoundTables' discussions will be presented to the IASB at its
January 2007 Meeting and a Transcript of all the RoundTables will also be available from the
IASB.
Top
3.
AASB update on Differential Reporting
Last week's ANT (ANT48, 15/12/2006) detailed the major results from the Australian
Accounting Standard's Board's (AASB) 13-14 December 2006 meeting. The AASB Action Alert has
now been issued and can be downloaded from http://www.aasb.com.au. It contains further details of the AASB's thinking
on Differential Reporting and the implications for the IASB's forthcoming Exposure Draft on
Financial Reporting Standards for SMEs (IFRS Lite/Light). The Action Alert notes that this
Issue will be further considered at its 14-15 February 2007 meeting and it intends to
canvass Constituents' views in due course.
Interestingly the Action Alert states: "...that an approach using public accountability as
the distinguishing factor between entities that apply full Australian equivalents to IFRSs
and those that apply a SMEs Standard should be investigated as an appropriate alternative to
the current differential reporting regime in Australia."
However this could appear to suggest that Companies that are not publicly accountable
(essentially smaller non-listed companies - eg Large Pty's and Small Clubs) and are clearly
Non-Reporting Entities, would be required to adopt the IFRS Lite/Light Standards.
As detailed in ANT47 (8/12/2006 - 4 Tier Financial Reporting Framework), there needs to be
a considered debate as to the user needs for those Non-Reporting Entities and whether the
IFRS Lite/Light Standard which the IASB states is only for Reporting Entities, is really
suitable for Australian Non-Reporting Entities. This is an Australian jurisdictional issue
and is very relevant to the Government's November 2006 Red Tape Proposals Paper.
The Institute's first Sydney CAs in Business Lunchtime AIFRS Discussion Group to be held on
Monday 12 February 2007 will consider this issue and the merits of the IFRS Lite/Light ED
for Australian Reporting Entities that are not publicly accountable. Please see the next
item for details.
Top
4.
The Institute's CABs' AIFRS Discussion Group meeting - 12 February
2007
The Institute's first AIFRS Discussion Group meeting for 2007 will be held on Monday 12
February 2007 in our offices at Chartered Accountants House, 37 York Street, Sydney NSW
2000.
The lunchtime meeting will begin at 12.30pm at the Level 5 Conference Centre and will be
chaired by Frank Palmer from Macquarie Bank and the Australian Accounting Standards Board
(AASB).
Guest speakers will be leading discussion on the changes in the International Accounting
Standards Model following the International Accounting Standards Board's decision to have a
2 tier Framework - AIFRS for Listed Entities and IFRS Lite (Light) for Non-Listed Reporting
Entities which will have reduced 'recognition & measurement' requirements as well as
significantly reduced disclosures (their SME project). How this fits in with the
Government's proposed 2.5 times increase in the size tests that trigger Corporations Act
reporting, the implications it has for the Reporting/Non-Reporting Entity requirements and
just what relief is available for the 2007 reporting season will all be part of the debate
at this meeting.
If you wish to attend this forum, please direct your RSVP to janema@icaa.org.au for seating and catering purposes by
Wednesday 7 February 2007.
Top
5.
AASB releases revised standards
As highlighted in ANT48, the AASB has now released onto its website the new and revised
standards approved at last week's meeting. They are: - AASB 1048 'Interpretation and
Application of Standards' - reissued to reflect IFRIC 10 (AASB Interpretation 'Interim
Financial Reporting and Impairment)
- Compiled Standard AASB 1045 "Land Under Roads:
Amendments to AAS 27A, AAS 29A and AAS 31A"
Go to the AASB website at http://www.aasb.com.au to download these.
Top
6.
IASB fair value measurement project
The AASB has also placed on its website a summary of the IASB's fair value measurement
discussion paper referred to in ANT 48. It is encouraging constituents to respond to the
discussion paper to both the AASB (by 2 March 2007) and to the IASB by 2 April 2007. The
full text of the discussion paper is available on the IASB website http://www.iasb.org.
Top
7.
AASB releases Updated List of Advisory Panel Members
The AASB has released and placed on its website an updated list of 'potential interpretation
advisory panel members'. These members represent the pool of expertise that the AASB can
draw upon in order to form its project advisory panels on topics requiring interpretation.
This new structure replaces the UIG which was disbanded on 1 July 2006.
To download the list, go to the AASB website at http://www.aasb.com.au.
Top
8.
IFRIC 11 clarification
The latest AASB Action Alert is now available from http://www.aasb.com.au. The Action Alert notes that the AASB did not
approve a draft Interpretation based on IFRIC 11, "IFRS 2 - Group and Treasury Share
Transactions" as they decided that the transitional provisions need to be clarified. A
revised draft will be considered at the AASB's February 2007 meeting.
Top
9.
IASB meeting highlights - 12-14 December 2006
The final meeting of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) for 2006 was held
on December 12-14 in London.
Key issues discussed were: - SME project
Following consideration of the latest draft ED of an IFRS for SMEs, the Board agreed that
the GAAP hierarchy for an SME should not include a 'mandatory fallback' to full IFRSs. The
hierarchy should be:
a) the requirements and guidance in the IFRS for SMEs dealing with similar and related
issues; and
b) the definitions, recognition criteria and measurement concepts for assets, liabilities,
income and expenses and the pervasive principles in Section 2 Concepts and Pervasive
Principles;
Accordingly, paragraph 10.4 of the draft ED would be revised to reflect the amendments.
- Borrowing costs
The Board agreed, by a majority of 10-4 to accept a staff
recommendation that it should proceed with the proposed amendments to IAS 23 which eliminate
the option to expense interest as incurred, thereby mandating the capitalisation method. The
Board also considered whether to include in IAS 23 an exception from the general principle
for certain inventories and agreed to provide the same exception as in FAS 34 p10. This
requires that 'interest cost shall not be capitalised for inventories that are routinely
manufactured or otherwise produced in large quantities on a repetitive basis. The Board also
discussed whether to amend the scope of revised IAS 23 to include assets that are carried at
fair value. The Board confirmed that there would be a scope exception for all assets
measured at fair value, including biological assets. Other decisions relate to:
- Amendments to IAS 39
- Annual Improvements Project - 2006
- Business Combinations Phase 2
- Conceptual Framework
- Consolidation
- Employee Benefits Including Pensions
- Financial Instruments - Comprehensive Project
- Financial Statement Presentation
- Intangible Assets
Deloitte's Observer notes can be found at http://www.iasplus.com/agenda/0612.htm. The December IASB Update is also
available at http://www.iasb.org.
Top
10.
IFAC releases paper on Micro-Entity Financial Reporting
The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) has released a paper 'Micro-entity
Financial Reporting: Perspectives of Preparers and Users' that explores the suitability of
SME Accounting Standard to Micro-Entities, following the proposal of an IFRS for SMEs
standard by the IASB. The paper includes a review of the existing research on the needs of
users and preparers of the financial reports of microentities and a survey of the legal
status of micro-entities in different countries.
To download the paper, visit the IFAC website at http://www.ifac.org.
Top
11.
IFAC releases two new International Public Sector standards
The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) of the IFAC has released
two new standards: - IPSAS 22 'Disclosure of Financial Information About the General
Government Sector'
- IPSAS 23 'Revenue from Non-Exchange Transactions (Taxes and Transfers)'
To view the
media release, go to the IFAC website http://www.ifac.org/MediaCenter. The new standards are also available for
download at http://www.ifac.org.
Top
12.
Audit standards and Audit manuals
Readers are reminded that, as a result of the many changes to the requirements of the
auditing standards, accounting standards and the Corporations Act, the audit manual you are
using may not be completely up to date.
You should check that whatever manuals, toolkits or programs you use incorporate all the
latest requirements.
Top
13.
Member services: your free 2007 Members' Handbook at the touch of a button
The Members' Handbook is Australia's most comprehensive guide to the standards, by-laws and
regulations that affect Chartered Accountants. Members can choose your preferred way to
access the handbook: - Online. This version can be accessed by all members through the
Institute website and will be updated every eight weeks in 2007. This will be the most
up-to-date version available as the year goes on. The online version cannot be downloaded
onto your hard drive, but standards can be cut and pasted into a Word document.
- CD Rom. This version will be mailed to members who request it (see below on how to do
this). The CD Rom is best suited for members who require the Members' Handbook on their hard
drive.
For the online version:
Simply visit the Members' Handbook page of the Institute's website.
For the CD Rom version:
If members wish to receive the updated CD Rom, they must update their profile on the
Institute's website. Read the step-by-step guide on how to update your profile.
Top
14.
Query of the week - financial instrument disclosures
Q: In the latest compiled version of AASB 132 I notice all the disclosure requirements
previously contained in paragraphs 51-95 have been deleted. Does that mean I no longer have
to provide all these disclosures relating to the risks the entity faces?
A: No. This version of AASB 132 applies on or after 1 January 2007 and must be read in
conjunction with the new AASB 7 "Financial instruments: Disclosures", which is also
operative on that date.
AASB 7 was issued by the AASB and IASB in August 2005. This standard moved the disclosure
requirements contained in paragraphs 51-95 of the former AASB 132 "Financial Instruments:
Disclosure and Presentation" into AASB 7 so as to include all financial instrument
disclosures in one place. The relevant paragraphs of AASB 132 were deleted via AASB omnibus
2005-10 so that AASB 132 now contains only presentation requirements for financial
instruments. As a result it was also renamed AASB 132 "Financial Instruments: Presentation".
Top
15.
EDs: comment closing dates
Outlined below are the comment closing dates for all current exposure drafts. Members are
encouraged to prepare their own submission on each document and submit them to the Institute
no later than one week before the closing date shown.
For more information, refer to the Institute's Technical Standards' exposure drafts web page
Forward all ED submission/comment emails to techsubmissions@icaa.org.au.
22 December 2006
Corporate & Financial Services Regulation Review Proposals Paper
http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?NavId=002&ContentID=1189
29 December 2006
IFAC - Proposals request on Explanatory Guide to assist small and medium practices apply
International Standard on quality Control (ISQC) 1
http://www.ifac.org/Downloads/SMP_Quality_Control_Guide_Request_for_Proposal.p
df
31 January 2006
AASB ED 151 - 'Australian Additions to, and Deletions from, IFRSs'
http://www.aasb.com.au
15 February 2007
IAASB EDs
ISA 320 (Revised and Redrafted), Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit;
ISA 450 (Redrafted), Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit;
ISA 260 (Revised and Redrafted), Communication with Those Charged with Governance.
http://www.ifac.org/Guidance/EXD-Outstanding.php
28 February 2007
IPSASB ED 30 "Impairment of Cash-Generating Assets"
IPSASB ED 31 "Employee Benefits"
http://www.ifac.org/EDs
31 March 2007
IPSASB ED ' Financial Reporting under the Cash Basis of Accounting - Disclosure Requirements
for Recipients of External Assistance'
http://www.ifac.org/EDs
2 April 2007
IASB Discussion Paper on Fair Value Measurements
http://www.iasb.org/News/Press+Releases
Technical Query Service
The Institute's Technical Standards Team responds to inquiries from members on auditing and
financial reporting issues. This service provides general assistance and guidance only.
Members have the responsibility to apply their own professional judgment. The service can be
contacted on (02) 9290 5702.
Do you know someone interested in receiving ANT?
We welcome new subscriptions. To subscribe, unsubscribe or to update your mailing details,
please visit http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/enewsletters/enewsletters
More information is available at our website.
TECHNICA/XFILES/ARTICLES/ANT/ANT 49_06_12_21.doc. The Technical Standards team comprises,
Jeanette Dawes CA, Roslyn Hatton CA, Stephanie Kemp CA, Claire Locke CA, Keith Reilly CA,
Andrew Stringer; Benjamin Lau and Jane Ma - Technical Standards Assistants.
Disclaimers
This is an initiative of, and has been prepared by the Technical Standards Team of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia. While every effort has been made to ensure
the accuracy of the information contained therein, neither the Institute nor its employees
shall be liable on any grounds whatsoever in respect of decisions or actions taken as a
result of using this publication. The information provided is a general guide only and
should not be used, relied on or treated as a substitute for specific professional advice or
referral to the relevant specific standard.
The information is this email is confidential to the named addressee and subject to
copyright. No one else may read, print, store, copy, forward or act in reliance on all or
any of this email or its attachments. If you are not he intended recipient, any use,
reliance upon, disclosure or copying of this email is prohibited and unlawful. If you have
received this email in error please notify the sender. The Institute of Chartered
Accountants in Australia (ABN 50 084 642 571) does not warrant that this email and any
attachments are error or virus free and recommends that all attachments be checked for
computer viruses.
|