Username:
Password:
Forgot Password?

AASB ITC 15 Request for Comment on IPSASB ED 34 and CP on Social Benefits

Print this Article Print this Article
Email this Article

The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) invites comment on ITC 15 Request for Comment on the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB) Exposure Draft ED 34 ‘Social Benefits: Disclosure of Cash Transfers to Individuals’ or Households and IPSASB Consultation Paper ‘Social Benefits: Issues in Recognition and Measurement’ (pdf). 
 
IPSASB ED 34 proposes particular disclosure requirements for public sector entities (generally governments) in respect of their cash transfer social benefits. It defines a cash transfer as a “social benefit, which is either provided directly in cash, or is an expense paid through the tax system, to protect individuals or households against certain social risks where use of the resources transferred is at the discretion of the individual or household”. Examples of these cash transfers are social security pensions, child benefits and unemployment benefits. 
 
The IPSASB Consultation Paper distinguishes three types of social benefits – namely, collective goods and services, individual goods and services, and cash transfers to individuals or households. The paper raises the following questions:

  • (In respect of each of these types of social benefits) whether a present obligation to provide them arises at any time and, if so, when 
  • (In respect of cash transfers to an individual or household) whether and, if so, when, a present obligation arises if contributions of resources to the government are required for the individual or household to become entitled to benefits 
  • (In relation to cash transfer programs that require individuals or households to revalidate their entitlement to benefits from time to time), whether revalidation is a criterion for the recognition of any such liabilities or a factor to take into account in the measurement of the liabilities 
  • whether a social benefit program should be treated as an in-substance ‘executory contract’.
In developing its project on social benefits, the IPSASB has concluded that financial statements alone may not provide users with enough information to assess the long-term viability of social benefit programs. It has, therefore, launched a new project to develop a framework for reporting on the long-term fiscal sustainability of governmental programs and finances. The IPSASB welcomes comments on the project brief by July 15, 2008. Further information about these projects is on the IFAC website
 
Submission 
The Institute together with CPA Australia and the NIA this week lodged a submission on the IPSASB’s ED 34 Social Benefits: Disclosure of Cash Transfers to Individuals or Households and Consultation Paper - Social Benefits: Issues in Recognition and Measurement and the AASB’s ITC 15. We did not support the issue of this material as an Australian ED at this stage as the project is not sufficiently developed, but expressed support for the IPSASB’s continued endeavours in this area.  
 
The submission can be downloaded from here.