Username:
Password:
Forgot Password?

Corporations Act: SRS Act

Print this Article Print this Article
Email this Article

Wholly owned subsidiaries and SRS Act changes 
as reported in ANT41/2007 
 
Q: My client was previously a wholly-owned large proprietary company which had entered into a deed of cross guarantee with its parent. Accordingly, it gained relief from the preparation and lodgment of financial statements using class order 98/1418, which required it to lodge a form 389 "Annual notice by wholly-owned entity relieved from financial reporting obligations." 
 
With the recent Corporations Act changes, the entity is now small. The deeds of cross guarantee still exist - so do we still have to lodge the relevant form each year? 
 
 
A: No. Lodgement of Form 389 is a condition of relief under Class Order 98/1418. As the company would no longer be relying on CO 98/1418 for relief from the requirement to prepare and lodge financial reports, lodgement of Form 389 is no longer required. 
 
 


 
Recent changes to Corporations Act – SRS Bill and Executives Remuneration (continued) 
as reported in ANT38/2007 
 
Q: Last week’s ANT referred to changes to directors’ and executives’ remuneration. Can you explain the nature of these changes in more detail? 
 
A: One of the changes introduced by the Corporations Legislation Amendment (Simpler Regulatory System) Act 2007 was to ?incorporate in the Corporations Act the accounting standards requirements for executive and director remuneration disclosure for listed companies. 
 
Under the old Law the remuneration disclosure requirements for individual directors and executives of listed companies was contained in both the accounting standards and the Corporations requirements. Listed companies were required to comply with both sets of requirements which resulted in both duplication and inconsistency. 
 
The amending Act creates a new disclosure framework which transfers both sets of requirements into the Corporations Act and Regulations and aligns them to remove inconsistencies. It also introduces a new disclosure requirement in relation to executives and directors hedging their incentive remuneration. The amending Act is effective for financial years commencing on or after 1 July 2007. 
 
The new changes: 
  • consolidate the remuneration disclosure requirements currently contained in section 300A of the Act and the accounting standards solely into the Corporations Act and Corporations Regulations. This means remuneration disclosures must now be made for any individual who falls within the definition of ‘key management personnel’, in addition to the existing directors and executives required to be disclosed under section 300A  
  • replace the terms of “directors, secretaries, senior management and other group executives” in section 300A with the term “key management personnel” which for the purposes of the Corporations Act will be defined as it is in the accounting standards to ensure consistency and ease of change as the accounting standards change  
  • modify the scope of all the remuneration disclosure requirements from listed companies to disclosing entities that are companies. 
  • require the remuneration information to be disclosed in the directors report rather than the audited financial report and require the company’s auditor to specifically express an opinion on the remuneration information. A strict liability offence in relation to the audit of the information in the directors’ report will be imposed  
  • require companies to disclose board policy in relation to directors and executives hedging their incentive remuneration and the mechanism that the company uses to enforce this policy 
  • clarify the disclosure requirement in section 300A(1)(e)(iv) concerning options lapsing to ensure that the policy intention of the requirement is achieved, and remove the requirement under subparagraph 300A(1)(e)(v) for companies to disclose the aggregate of options granted, exercised and that have lapsed during the year, on the grounds that is not being used by shareholders
More details are included in the Explanatory Memorandum. The new regulations are contained in SLI 2007 No. 193
 
 

 
Recent changes to Corporations Act – SRS Bill and Executives Remuneration 
as reported in ANT37/2007  
 
Q: I heard that the latest Corporations Amendment Act has, amongst other things made changes to directors and executive remuneration disclosures. Is this correct? 
 
A: Yes. The Corporations Legislation Amendment (Simpler Regulatory System) Act 2007 was passed by parliament in late June and received royal assent on June 28. The Act put into law a range of changes designed to ease the regulatory burden on business in response to various “red tape” reports issued in 2006.  
 
The Act makes changes in a number of areas including financial services regulations, auditor independence, corporate governance, takeovers and fundraising. Of particular benefit to companies were the changes made to compliance requirements (including simplifying the returns of company particulars and permitting electronic registration of charges) and the changes made to company reporting obligations. These latter changes included:
  • incorporating into the Corporations Act the accounting standards requirements for executive and director remuneration disclosure for listed entities to improve consistency and reduce duplication; 
  • increasing the thresholds used to define a large proprietary company and allow for future changes to the thresholds to be prescribed by regulations (refer ANT25: 29 June 2007)  
  • changing the notification requirements, payment of annual fees and the company deregistration procedure; and 
  • allowing companies to make annual reports available on the internet and only require hard copies to be sent to members who request them.
The commencement dates for each of these changes vary. The amendments concerning the thresholds and distribution of annual reports apply to financial years ending on or after commencement (i.e. to 30 June 2007 year ends) while the directors and executives remuneration changes apply to financial years beginning on or after commencement (i.e. 30 June 2008 year ends.) 
 
Details regarding the commencement and application of all elements of the package are included in the Explanatory Memorandum
 
 

 
Client no longer requires an audit because of changes to the size thresholds 
as reported in ANT27/2007 
 
Q: My audit client was a large proprietary company but became small at 30 June 2007 due to the threshold changes in the Simpler Regulatory System Bill that was given royal assent on 28 June 2007. Do I need to resign as auditor?  
 
A:
The Simpler Regulatory Bill changed the thresholds for proprietary companies to $25 million in consolidated revenue and $12.5 million in consolidated assets. The threshold regarding the number of employees remains at 50 employees. The test remains passing 2 out of 3 to be classified as large and thus require an audit under the provisions of the Corporations Act. 
 
Action you should consider:
  1. If you have not already done so, advise your client of the changes immediately, including the fact that they will no longer be required to undergo a statutory audit for the 30 June 2007 financial year.  
  2. Discuss with your client whether they still wish to avail themselves of your audit services. Audits provide many benefits to clients over and above the statutory obligations fulfilled. You and your client should discuss these benefits and make an appropriate decision in the circumstances. It is possible that shareholders and / or providers of finance may nevertheless require an audit to be performed. 
  3. If the client chooses not to have an audit you should resign as promptly as possible. You should do so in writing to the directors. However because the audit is of a proprietary company that no longer requires an audit under the provisions of the Corporations Act, you do not have to notify ASIC. The question of an audit engagement at 30 June 2007 thus becomes a matter between you and your client. 
  4. The company will need to notify ASIC within 14 days of receiving your notice of resignation.<p> 
  5. Be aware of your section 311 responsibilities up until the date of your resignation and your obligations under the auditing standards especially ASA 300" Planning an audit of a financial report". You may also need to remind the client of their obligations under section 331 to pay your reasonable fees and expenses for any work necessarily performed up until such time as your resignation takes effect. This may include year end physical inventory counts or other asset verification procedures, audit planning work or other interim audit procedures you may have performed.
Small proprietary companies that are controlled by foreign companies must continue to prepare audited financial reports (subject to exceptions in the Act and ASIC class orders), as must small proprietary companies subject to relevant shareholder and ASIC directions. 
 

 
Applying the changes from the SRS Bill 
as reported in ANT25/2007 
 
 
Q: My audit client was a large proprietary company but became small at 30 June 2007 due to the threshold changes in the Simpler Regulatory System Bill referred to in item 1 above. What do I need to do? 
 
A:
The Simpler Regulatory Bill changed the thresholds for proprietary companies to $25 million in revenue and $12.5 million in assets. The threshold regarding the number of employees remains at 50 employees. The test remains passing 2 out of 3 to be classified as large. 
 
Note that foreign controlled companies are generally unaffected by these changes because the Corporations Act treats these types of entities as large (subject to the requirments of s292 of the Act and ASIC class order 98/0098. Also small companies can still be required to report by either a shareholder or ASIC direction (sections 293 and 294) 
 
If your client is one of the approximately 1600 companies that will be immediately affected by these changes there are several steps you need to take.
  1. If you have not already done so, advise your client of the changes immediately, including the fact that they will no longer be required to undergo a statutory audit for the 30 June 2007 financial year. 
  2. Discuss whether they still wish to avail themselves of your audit services. Audits provide many benefits to clients over and above the statutory obligations fulfilled. You and your client should discuss these benefits and make an appropriate decision in the circumstances.  
  3. If the client chooses not to require an auditor then you should resign as promptly as possible. A letter to the directors is required and ASIC is required to be notified under section 327(5). However because the audit is of a proprietary company, ASIC permission is not required and therefore the resignation can take effect from (at the earliest) the date the client receives your letter). 
  4. Be aware of your section 311 responsibilities up until the date of your resignation and your obligations under the auditing standards especially ASA 300" Planning an audit of a financial report". You may also need to remind the client of their obligations under section 331 to pay you reasonable fees and expenses for any work necessarily performed up until such time as your resignation takes effect. This may include year end cash counts/stocktakes and preliminary planning work that you may have already performed.
The following references are available to assist members. Sections 329-331 of the Corporations Act AGS 1004 Transitional arrangements on changes in audit appointments under the Corporations Act and ASIC Practice Note 34 "Auditors' Obligations: reporting to ASIC". 
 

 
Changes to the size tests 
as reported in ANT22/2007 
 
Q: I hear the Corporations Act is changing to increase the size thresholds for small and large proprietary companies. Will this be effective for the 30 June 2007 reporting season and, if so, what are the new thresholds? 
 
A:
We expect so. The proposals you refer to were part of the Corporate and Financial Services Regulation Review - Proposals Paper released in November 2006 and these have now been tabled in Parliament in the form of the Simpler Regulatory System Bill. 
 
Amongst other things the Bill is proposing revisions to section 45A(2) of the Corporations Act which sets the size thresholds for determining whether an entity is a small or large proprietary company and therefore required to prepare and lodge audited accounts under the Corporations Act.  
 
The two out of three test in this section remains but the revenue and assets thresholds contained therein have been uplifted by 2.5 times while the employee threshold remains unchanged 
 
According to Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, Chris Pearce, the Bill is expected to be passed in the current Parliamentary sitting and the new thresholds applied to years that end on or after the commencement date, which is expected to be 30 June 2007. If the passage of the Bill goes according to plan, the changes will apply to the 2006/7 financial year. 
 
Therefore members preparing to produce/audit financial reports as at 30 June 2007 should be able to apply the new size tests, that is revenue of $25 million (previously $10 million) and assets of $12.5 million (previously $5million) to their assessment of small/ large for reporting purposes. As mentioned above, the threshold regarding the number of employees will remain unchanged at 50 employees. Approximately 1600 entities are expected to benefit from this change which will significantly reduce their reporting costs. 
 
Our ANT newsletter will keep you up to date with developments on the passage of the Bill.