Issue No 48/2006 - ANT48
15 December 2006
HEADLINES
- AASB meeting highlights - 13-14 December 2006
- The Institute's draft submission on ED 151
- Do you respond to exposure drafts?
- IASB publishes discussion paper on fair value measurements
- New IAASB ED's issued
- IPSASB ED on External Assistance
- Is the Annual Report Dead?
- English Institute questions use of fair value accounting
- Deloitte releases IFRS model financial statements for 2006
- Query of the week - AFS Licensees & Reporting Requirements
- EDs: comment closing dates
Welcome to the forty-eighth edition of Accounting & Auditing News Today for 2006. What
follows is a brief update on changes and proposed changes in the financial reporting sphere.
1.
AASB meeting highlights - 13-14 December 2006
The latest meeting of the Australian Accounting Standards Board was held in Melbourne on
13-14 December 2006. Highlights of the meeting included the following:
Insurance: Received a staff update on the IASB proposals on insurance contracts, and
the implications for Australian constituents, in particular, health insurers and roadside
assistance entities.
Segment Reporting: Discussed the scope paragraph of IFRS 8 'Operating Segments', and
agreed to apply it in the Australian context. Adopting this scope requirement means that
for-profit entities, such as unlisted and large proprietary companies, that have not or are
not in the process of issuing securities in a public market would not longer be required to
make segment disclosures. The AASB is expected to approve AASB 8 'Operating Segments' and a
consequential amending standard at its February 2007 meeting. AASB 8 will supersede AASB 114
'Segment Reporting'.
GGS Interim Reporting: The interactions of AASB 134 'Interim Financial Reporting' and
AASB 1049 'Financial Reporting of General Government Sector by Governments' were discussed,
and it was agreed to amended AASB 134 to scope out interim reporting requirements for GGS.
Administered Items: It was decided not to proceed with this project, including the
proposals in the draft Exposure Draft 'Disclosure of Administered and Fiduciary Items Held
by Not-for-Profit Public Sector Entities'.
Interpretation: Group and Treasury Shares: AASB Interpretation 11 'AASB 2 - Group and
Treasury Share Transactions' was approved, based on IFRIC 11 ' IFRS 2 - Group and Treasury
Share Transactions'. AASB 1048 'Interpretation and Application of Standards' was also
approved reflecting the inclusion of AASB Interpretation 11.
Rejected Issue: AASB 112 'Income Taxes - Scope: Australian Petroleum Resource Rent
Tax': Agreed to seek the recommendation of an Interpretations Advisory Committee to the AASB
on whether the PRRT falls within the scope of AASB 112 for specific inclusion in the
Rejected Issue Notice.
Emission Rights: Agreed to request the IASB to accelerate its deliberations on the
topic.
Services Concessions: Agreed to consider IFRIC's Interpretation on services
concession arrangements for approval at the February meeting of the AASB. An Interpretations
Advisory Committee of the AASB is to be formed to make recommendations to the AASB on the
financial reporting implications for entities outside the scope of the proposed Australian
Interpretation.
Corporate and Financial Services Regulation: Agreed the general direction of a
submission on the financial reporting proposals contained in 'The Corporate and Financial
Services Regulation Review - Proposals Paper' released by the Parliamentary Secretary to the
Treasurer.
Differential Reporting/SMEs: Tentatively agreed a tiered approach to general purpose
financial reporting under the Corporations Act that includes: AIFRS; the proposed SME
Exposure Draft; other 'non-reporting' entities that prepare and lodge; and disclosure relief
for subsidiaries. The proposed SME public accountability concept is being further considered
in the context of not-for-profit entities and public sector entities. The IASB's SME
proposals will be released in the Australian context in 2007 with an explanation of the
implications for the Australian financial reporting, in particular the reporting and
non-reporting entity classification, and general purpose and special purpose financial
reporting. These issues will be further discussed at the February meeting.
Review of AAS 27, AAS 29 and AAS 31: Reviewed the draft Basis for Conclusions, and
discussed issues relating to land under roads and heritage assets. A draft exposure draft
will be considered in the 1st quarter of 2007.
Common Control Transactions: Provided an Australian perspective on common control
transactions as input to the IASB Agenda decision-making process.
Non-exchange Revenue: Following the approval of a standard 'Revenue from Non-exchange
Transactions' by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB), the
AASB agreed to seek the cooperation of the NZ Financial Reporting Standards Board in the
development of a joint standard based on the IPSASB standard.
IPSASB Exposure Drafts: Agreed the overall direction of submissions to the IPSASB on
ED 30 'Impairment of Cash-generating Units' and ED 31 'Employee Benefits'.
Contributed by Colin Parker, FCA, Principal GAAP Consulting http://www.gaap.com.au, and a
member of the AASB.
Top
2.
The Institute's draft submission on ED 151
A draft Submission to the Australian Accounting Standards Board on its recently issued
Exposure Draft 151 'Australian Additions to, and Deletions from, IFRSs' is available
here.
In summary, the Institute draft Submission argues that there should be minimal differences
between Australian equivalents to IFRS (AIFRS) and IFRS. Mostly those differences will be
due to either the need to adopt some Australian regulatory references as the Australian
Corporations Act requires compliance with AIFRS, and necessary amendments for the
Not-for-Profit (including the Public) Sector.
Submissions are due by 31 January 2007, so any Comments that Members have would be
welcomed by 26 January 2007 and can be emailed to
keith@icaa.org.au.
Top
3.
Do you respond to exposure drafts?
The Faculty of Economics and Commerce of the University of Western Australia would like to
invite you to take about five minutes of your time to respond to their survey studying the
reasons behind the current low response rate to the EDs of proposed accounting standards.
Both the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Australian Accounting
Standards Board (AASB) have a due process where there is an opportunity to comment on
proposed accounting standards. As part of this process the AASB asks constituents to respond
to both the AASB and the IASB on the content of exposure drafts. Response to the AASB is
generally required about 1 month prior to the closing date for comments to the IASB. This
allows time for the AASB to consider the views of Australian constituents in formulating its
own response on the exposure draft to the IASB.
This survey is aimed at gathering evidence on the extent to which members of the accounting
profession participate in the due process and whether this has changed with the adoption of
IFRS. The faculty would appreciate if you are able to take about five minutes to complete
the survey as the results of the survey may well influence the due process approach adopted
by the AASB now that Australia has adopted IFRS.
One lucky respondent to the survey will win a gourmet food hamper valued at $150. The
faculty is particularly keen to get responses from members who have never made a submission
to the AASB or who did so before the adoption of IFRS but have not done so since then.
If you would like to participate in this study please click on this link: http://survey.xrar.com.au/index.php?sid=86.
Top
4.
IASB publishes discussion paper on fair value measurements
In response to requests from constituents for more guidance in the area of fair value
measurement, the IASB has published a discussion paper on this topic for public comment.
The paper seeks to provide guidance on the meaning of the term fair value as it is used in
IFRS and provide a consistent basis for its measurement. The IASB believes establishing a
concise definition of fair value and a single source of guidance for all fair value
measurements required by IFRSs will both simply IFRSs and improve the quality of fair value
information included in financial reports.
The discussion paper is open for comment until 2 April 2007 and the IASB then expects
to issue an ED on fair value measurement in 2008.
For more information, visit the IASB website at http://www.iasb.org.
Top
5.
New IAASB ED's issued
The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) has issued a further three
new exposure drafts (EDs) as part of its ongoing 'clarity project" which revises and updates
its standards in accordance with its new clarity drafting conventions.
The three proposed International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) are: - ISA 320 (Revised
and Redrafted), 'Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit';
- ISA 450 (Redrafted), 'Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit'; and
- ISA 260 (Revised and Redrafted), 'Communication with Those Charged with
Governance'.
These EDs may be downloaded at http://www.ifac.org/Guidance/EXD-Details.php?EDID=0062. Comments are
requested by 15 February 2007, and may be emailed to edcomments@ifac.org.
The new ED's will be addressed by the AUASB at their next meeting.
Top
6.
IPSASB ED on External Assistance
The International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPASB) has issued a new ED 'Financial
Reporting under the Cash Basis of Accounting - Disclosure Requirements for Recipients of
External Assistance'. The purpose of the ED is to improve the disclosure of financial
information about the external assistance and development aid received by governments and
government agencies. Amongst a number of proposed new disclosures, the ED requires
recipients' financial statements to disclose the total amount of external assistance
received, used, and available during the reporting period.
The ED may be downloaded at http://www.ifac.org/EDs, and comments are requested by 31 March
2007.
Top
7.
Is the Annual Report Dead?
The Institute, in conjunction with Melbourne University, recently hosted a Roundtable
discussion, which brought together four of the nation's leading authorities in the
accounting and financial services profession to discuss the question: "Is the Annual Report
Dead?"
The new Federal Government proposals designed to cut red tape could see the end of the
traditional annual report, with many companies now considering posting their reports online,
while providing the option of a print copy to those shareholders who request it.
The panel postulated other changes that should be taken into consideration,
including: - engaging the standard setters to discuss what information the users are
actually seeking rather than second-guessing what they believe the users consider relevant,
- developing a more shareholder friendly report,
- moving to the new XBRL format, which is a language and taxonomy for capturing financial
information for improved analysis abs communication and
- moving the annual report to the company websites, which will be structured to assist
people getting the headline news and the option of drilling down through detailed
layers
Top
8.
English Institute questions use of fair value accounting
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales (ICAEW) has recently released a
paper on Measurement in Financial Reporting as part of its Thought Leadership Program. The
83 page Paper explores the growing use of Fair Values in Accounting (Financial Reporting)
Standards and raises fundamental questions about the basis of measurement in financial
reporting. Given the IASB's recent discussion Paper on Fair Value Measurements (see Item 5
above), the ICAEW Paper is timely.
Interestingly the Paper does not conclude that a single basis of measurement is appropriate.
Instead it argues that the measurement basis needs to be considered on a practical basis so
as to provide the most useful information on a cost effective basis. In particular the Paper
suggests that the answers to what measurement basis should be used may well vary for
different items in the financial statements, for different entities, for differential
purposes of financial reporting, and in different institutional settings.
This model clearly supports the philosophies behind our own Business Practice Guide that
uses a simplified combination of historical cost and market value accounting depending on
the particular transaction items.
A copy of the ICAEW Paper including a questionnaire seeking feedback on measurement
reporting issues can be obtained from http://www.icaew.co.uk/index.cfm?route=127760.
Top
9.
Deloitte releases IFRS model financial statements for 2006
Deloitte has released a preliminary version of IFRS Model Financial Statements for 2006.
This preliminary version provides an aid to those companies currently working on their
December 2006 financial statements. The final version is expected to be published in January
2007. To download a copy of the statements, go to the Deloittes website at http://www.iasplus.com/fs/fs.htm.
Top
10.
Query of the week - AFS Licensees & Reporting Requirements
Q: I have a client that holds an Australian Financial Services license and am confused
about the reporting requirements.
A: AFS Licensees are required to lodge a profit and loss statement, balance sheet (Form
FS70) and audit report (Form FS71) with ASIC annually.
When preparing the financial statements of the entity, the licensee must determine whether
the entity is a reporting entity or not. Whilst the current legislation allows for a
non-reporting entity to prepare 'special purpose' financials, ASIC, as the primary user, is
requiring Licensees to lodge 'general purpose' financials (i.e. adopting all the Accounting
Standards). This arises as ASIC Form FS 70 requires the annual financial statements of AFS
licensees to comply with the accounting standards via s989C and Reg. 7.8.13(1). FS 70 allows
for the rare circumstances in which an AFS licensee is not a reporting entity, but ASIC's
Information Release 00/025, "Reporting requirements for non-reporting entities" states that
ASIC believes that licensed securities dealers and futures brokers would only be
non-reporting entities in rare and exceptional circumstances such as a securities dealer who
is not carrying on business and has no proper authority holders. The auditor needs to review
this decision to ensure the reporting entity assessment is reasonable.
The auditor can use an audit program for a services entity (large or small) depending on the
size and complexity of the licensee's operations. This program will need to be modified to
include work steps related to compliance with the financial requirements of the licence and
the licensee's ability to continue to meet its obligations (s990 K(2)) as these matters are
included in the audit report. ASIC's Policy Statement 166, "Licensing: Financial
Requirements" covers financial requirements for licensees, including audit. It is available
from ASIC at http://www.asic.gov.au. Paragraph 166.27 onwards lists those matters that
ASIC requires assurance on in the audit report.
In October 2004, the AUASB issued AGS 1068, Audit Requirements for Australian Financial
Services Licensees under the Corporations Act 2001 to assist members auditing these
entities.
Note that the auditor of an AFS Licensee needs to be a Registered Company Auditor.
Note also that ASIC have issued an updated Form FS71 'Audit Report' dated 1 October 2006.
More details will be available in next week's ANT.
Top
11.
EDs: comment closing dates
Outlined below are the comment closing dates for all current exposure drafts. Members are
encouraged to prepare their own submission on each document and submit them to the Institute
no later than one week before the closing date shown.
For more information, refer to the Institute's Technical Standards' exposure drafts web page
Forward all ED submission/comment emails to techsubmissions@icaa.org.au.
15 December 2006
IAESB - 'Approaches to Developing and Maintaining Professional Values, Ethics and Attitudes'
http://www.ifac.org/Eds
Treasury - Comparative review of the Australian Auditor Independence Requirements
http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?NavId=037&ContentID=1184
22 December 2006
Corporate & Financial Services Regulation Review Proposals Paper
http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?NavId=002&ContentID=1189
29 December 2006
IFAC - Proposals request on Explanatory Guide to assist small and medium practices apply
International Standard on quality Control (ISQC) 1
http://www.ifac.org/Downloads/SMP_Quality_Control_Guide_Request_for_Proposal.p
df
31 January 2006
AASB ED 151 - 'Australian Additions to, and Deletions from, IFRSs'
http://www.aasb.com.au
15 February 2007
IAASB EDs
ISA 320 (Revised and Redrafted), Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit;
ISA 450 (Redrafted), Evaluation of Misstatements Identified during the Audit;
ISA 260 (Revised and Redrafted), Communication with Those Charged with Governance.
http://www.ifac.org/Guidance/EXD-Outstanding.php
28 February 2007
IPSASB ED 30 "Impairment of Cash-Generating Assets"
IPSASB ED 31 "Employee Benefits"
http://www.ifac.org/EDs
31 March 2007
IPSASB ED ' Financial Reporting under the Cash Basis of Accounting - Disclosure Requirements
for Recipients of External Assistance'
http://www.ifac.org/EDs
2 April 2007
IASB Discussion Paper on Fair Value Measurements
http://www.iasb.org/News/Press+Releases
Technical Query Service
The Institute's Technical Standards Team responds to inquiries from members on auditing and
financial reporting issues. This service provides general assistance and guidance only.
Members have the responsibility to apply their own professional judgment. The service can be
contacted on (02) 9290 5702.
Do you know someone interested in receiving ANT?
We welcome new subscriptions. To subscribe, unsubscribe or to update your mailing details,
please visit http://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/enewsletters/enewsletters
More information is available at our website.
TECHNICA/XFILES/ARTICLES/ANT/ANT ANT48_06_12_15.doc. The Technical Standards team comprises,
Jeanette Dawes CA, Roslyn Hatton CA, Stephanie Kemp CA, Claire Locke CA, Keith Reilly CA,
Andrew Stringer; Benjamin Lau and Jane Ma - Technical Standards Assistants.
Disclaimers
This is an initiative of, and has been prepared by the Technical Standards Team of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia. While every effort has been made to ensure
the accuracy of the information contained therein, neither the Institute nor its employees
shall be liable on any grounds whatsoever in respect of decisions or actions taken as a
result of using this publication. The information provided is a general guide only and
should not be used, relied on or treated as a substitute for specific professional advice or
referral to the relevant specific standard.
The information is this email is confidential to the named addressee and subject to
copyright. No one else may read, print, store, copy, forward or act in reliance on all or
any of this email or its attachments. If you are not he intended recipient, any use,
reliance upon, disclosure or copying of this email is prohibited and unlawful. If you have
received this email in error please notify the sender. The Institute of Chartered
Accountants in Australia (ABN 50 084 642 571) does not warrant that this email and any
attachments are error or virus free and recommends that all attachments be checked for
computer viruses.
|